褐点石斑鱼不同月龄形态性状的主成分及通径分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广东海洋大学,广东海洋大学,广东海洋大学,广东海洋大学,广东海洋大学,广东海洋大学

中图分类号:

S965.3

基金项目:

广东省科技厅项目(2016B020201009,2013B090700010);广东省教育厅高校重点实验室滚动支持项目(2013CXDA019);广东海洋大学“创新强校工程”项目(GDOU2016050251)


Principal component and path analysis of morphological traits of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus at different month ages
Author:
Affiliation:

Guangdong Ocean University,Guangdong Ocean University,,,,

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [36]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为研究褐点石斑鱼不同月龄形态性状的生长规律特征及形态性状对体质量的影响,采用主成分分析和通径分析方法对3月龄、8月龄和13月龄褐点石斑鱼个体全长(X1)、体长(X2)、头长(X3)、体宽(X4)、体高(X5)、尾柄高(X6)、眼径(X7)、眼后头长(X8)和体质量(Y)9个性状进行分析。结果显示,(1)不同月龄褐点石斑鱼各形态性状对体质量的相关系数均达到极显著水平,不同月龄相同形态性状与体质量的相关性存在差异。(2)各月龄第一主成分均指向褐点石斑鱼的生长发育情况;第二主成分均指向眼睛发育情况;但3月龄、8月龄和13月龄第三主成分分别指向尾部发育、体宽发育及体高发育。(3)3月龄阶段,全长、体高、体宽及尾柄高对体质量的直接通径系数达到显著水平;8月龄阶段,全长、体宽、尾柄高及眼后头长对体质量的直接通径系数达到显著水平;13月龄阶段,全长、体高、体宽及体长对体质量的直接通径系数达到极显著水平,并建立了3个月龄组的不同形态性状对体质量最优回归方程。(4)褐点石斑鱼3~13月龄阶段的体长(L)与体质量(W)的关系为W=0.0378L2.873R2=0.9596),说明该阶段生长属于等速生长。研究表明,在褐点石斑鱼的不同生长阶段,各形态性状对体质量的影响有所不同,建议以全长(3~13月龄)作为育种工作的目标性状,为褐点石斑鱼早期生长发育阶段的选择育种工作和测量指标提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    In order to research growth characteristics and the effect of morphological traits on body mass of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus at different month ages, data of total length (X1), standard length (X2), head length (X3), body width (X4), body depth (X5), caudal peduncle depth (X6), eye diameter (X7), head length after eye (X8) and body mass (Y) were collected at 3 months, 8 months and 13 months of age in this study. The morphological traits were analyzed by principal component and path analysis. The results showed that: (1) the correlation coefficients between all morphological traits at different age phases and body mass were extremely significant. And the correlation coefficients between each trait and body mass differed at different age development stages. (2) The first principal component reflected the growth and development of E. fuscoguttatus at different growth phases. The second principal component reflected the development of eye at different month ages. Thes third principal component was different and reflected the tail development at 3-month-old, body width development at 8-month-old and body height development at 13-month-old. (3) The trait with strongest direct effect on body mass was total length at all the age phases (0.742, 0.776 and 0.840). The path coefficients of four morphometric attributes (X1, X5, X4, X6) for 3-month body mass reached significant difference level. The path coefficients of X1, X4, X6, and X8 for 8-month body mass were also significant. The path coefficients of X1, X5, X4 and X2 for 13-month body mass were highly significant. The multivariate regression equation was Y3-month-old=–36.774+3.992X1+2.295X5+2.759X4+2.186X6, Y8-month-old=–64.569+7.020X1+6.480X4+6.754X6+50.926X8, and Y13-month-old=–302.340+18.128X1+17.688X5–28.463X4+5.928X2. This result suggests that the vital traits that affected body mass at different growth phases were different. (4) The relation equation between standard length and body mass was W=0.0378L2.873 (R2=0.9596) in 3-month to 13-month stages of E. fuscoguttatus, which demonstrated the standard length and body mass growth at similar velocity. We proposed that the total length was the target trait for selective breeding of E. fuscoguttatus at 3–13 month-old stages .This paper provides theoretical evidence and measure targets for breeding of E. fuscoguttatus in the early growth stage in aquaculture.

    参考文献
    [1] Bai L R, Zhao Z Y. Study on embryonic development, larva, juvenile and young fish of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus[J]. Agriculture Science & Technology, 2016, 17(6):1305-1314, 1354
    [2] Lim L S, Chor W K, Tuzan A D, et al. Betaine is a feed enhancer for juvenile grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus) as determined behaviourally[J]. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2016, 44(1):415-418.
    [3] Low C F, Mariana N S, Maha A, et al. Identification of immune response-related genes and signalling pathways in spleen of Vibrio parahaemolyticus-infected Epinephelus fuscoguttatus (Forskal) by next-generation sequencing[J]. Journal of Fish Diseases, 2016, 39(3):389-394.
    [4] Cho W K, Lim L S, Chong M, et al. Evaluation of tempeh as a potential alternative protein source in the diets for juvenile tiger grouper, Epinephelus fuscoguttatus[J]. Malaysian Journal of Science, 2015, 34(1):58-68.
    [5] 周晖, 陈刚, 纪多亮, 等. 3种蛋白替代鱼粉对褐点石斑鱼生长、体成分及能量收支的影响[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2012, 32(6):10-16. Zhou H, Chen G, Ji D L, et al. The effects of partial replacement of fish meal by three protein sources on growth performance approximate compositions and energy budget of juvenile brown-marbled grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus)[J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2012, 32(6):10-16(in Chinese).
    [6] 谢瑞涛, 杨丽云, 张海涛, 等. 3种人工养殖石斑鱼肌肉的蛋白质营养价值评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(16):151-153. Xie R T, Yang L Y, Zhang H T, et al. Protein nutritional value evaluation in three species of cultured groupers' muscle[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(16):151-153(in Chinese).
    [7] 何晓群. 多元统计分析[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2008. He X Q. Multivariate statistical analysis[M]. Beijing:Chinese People's University Press, 2008(in Chinese).
    [8] 顾得月, 任西杰, 迟长凤, 等. 大黄鱼HPLC指纹图谱的建立及其在产地溯源和物种鉴别中的应用[J]. 水产学报, 2016, 40(2):164-177. Gu D Y, Ren X J, Chi C F, et al. HPLC fingerprint of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) and its application to geographical origin traceability and species identification[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2016, 40(2):164-177(in Chinese).
    [9] 许德高, 李学梅, 朱永久, 等. 不同投喂方式对鳙形态特征的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2016, 40(6):873-881. Xu D G, Li X M, Zhu Y J, et al. Morphological variations of bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) fed by feedstuff[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2016, 40(6):873-881(in Chinese).
    [10] 吕帆, 朱文彬, 王兰梅, 等. 福瑞鲤与黄河鲤、建鲤鱼肉品质的比较及影响肉质的主成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(5):28-34. Lü F, Zhu W B, Wang L M, et al. Meat quality comparison of FFRC strain common carp with Huanghe carp and Jian carp and factors influencing their meat quality[J]. Food Science, 2016, 37(5):28-34(in Chinese).
    [11] 高天翔, 张秀梅, 柳广东, 等. 10个日本绒螯蟹群体与中华绒螯蟹形态的主成分分析[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2003, 18(4):273-277. Gao T X, Zhang X M, Liu G D, et al. Principal component analysis on the morphology of ten Eriocheir japonica populations and E. sinensis[J]. Journal of Dalian Fisheries University, 2003, 18(4):273-277(in Chinese).
    [12] 杨严鸥, 李林春, 操玉涛. 中华鲟繁殖力的主成分分析研究[J]. 信阳农业高等专科学校学报, 2000, 10(1):46-49. Yang Y O, Li L C, Cao Y T. The principal components analysis in the study of Acipenser sinensis cray fecundity[J]. Journal of Xinyang Agriculture College, 2000, 10(1):46-49(in Chinese).
    [13] 李镕, 白俊杰, 李胜杰, 等. 大口黑鲈家系早期形态性状的相关和主成分分析[J]. 海洋渔业, 2011, 33(3):282-288. Li R, Bai J J, Li S J, et al. Correlation and principal components analysis of morphological traits of Micropterus salmoides family at early age[J]. Marine Fisheries, 2011, 33(3):282-288(in Chinese).
    [14] 唐瞻杨, 肖俊, 李莉萍, 等. 尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis niloticus)不同月龄性状的主成分与判别分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2012, 43(2):288-293. Tang Z Y, Xiao J, Li L P, et al. Principal component and discriminant analyses of traits of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) at different ages[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2012, 43(2):288-293(in Chinese).
    [15] 窦亚琪, 梁旭方, 易提林, 等. 翘嘴鳜不同月龄性状的主成分与判别分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2014, 21(6):1116-1124. Dou Y Q, Liang X F, Yi T L, et al. Principal component and discriminant analyses of traits of Siniperca chuatsi at different ages[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2014, 21(6):1116-1124(in Chinese).
    [16] 韩慧宗, 姜海滨, 王斐, 等. 许氏平鲉不同月龄选育群体形态性状的主成分与通径分析[J]. 水产学报, 2016, 40(8):1163-1172. Han H Z, Jiang H B, Wang F, et al. Principal component and path analysis of morphological traits of selective groups at different month ages of Sebastes schlegeli[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2016, 40(8):1163-1172(in Chinese).
    [17] 陈红林, 田永胜, 刘峰, 等. 不同时期牙鲆形态性状对体重影响的通径分析及曲线拟合研究[J]. 中国水产科学, 2016, 23(1):64-76. Chen H L, Tian Y S, Liu F, et al. Path analysis and curve estimates of morphometric traits and body weight of Paralichthys olivaceus at different growth stages[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2016, 23(1):64-76(in Chinese).
    [18] 刘峰, 陈琳, 楼宝, 等. 小黄鱼(PseudosciaLiu F, Chen L, Lou B, et al. Correlation and path coefficient analysis on body weight and morphometric traits of small yellow croaker Pseudosciaena polyactis[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2016, 47(3):655-662(in Chinese).a polyactis)形态性状与体质量的相关性及通径分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2016, 47(3):655-662 Liu F, Chen L, Lou B, et al. Correlation and path coefficient analysis on body weight and morphometric traits of small yellow croaker Pseudosciaena polyactis[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2016, 47(3):655-662(in Chinese).
    [19] 时立文. SPSS 19.0统计分析从入门到精通[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2012. Shi L W. Statistical analysis with SPSS 19.0- from beginner to mastery[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2012(in Chinese).
    [20] 杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6. Du J J, Chen Z W. Method of path analysis with SPSS linear regression[J]. Biology Bulletin, 2010, 45(2):4-6(in Chinese).
    [21] 王新安, 马爱军, 许可, 等. 大菱鲆幼鱼表型形态性状与体重之间的关系[J]. 动物学报, 2008, 54(3):540-545. Wang X A, Ma A J, Xu K, et al. Relationship between morphometric attributes and body weight of juvenile turbots Scophthalmus maximus[J]. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 2008, 54(3):540-545(in Chinese).
    [22] 谢从新. 鱼类学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2010. Xie C X. Ichthyology[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2010(in Chinese).
    [23] 刘贤德, 蔡明夷, 王志勇, 等. 不同生长时期大黄鱼形态性状与体重的相关性分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2011, 29(5):159-163. Liu X D, Cai M Y, Wang Z Y, et al. Correlation analysis of morphometric traits and body weight of large yellow croaker Pseudosciaena crocea at different growth stage[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2011, 29(5):159-163(in Chinese).
    [24] 郑昇阳. 不同生长阶段黄姑鱼形态性状对体质量的影响效果分析[J]. 宁德师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2015, 27(4):413-417. Zheng S Y. Correlation analysis of morphometric traits and body weight of Nibea albiflora at different growth stages[J]. Journal of Ningde Normal University (Natural Science), 2015, 27(4):413-417(in Chinese).
    [25] 唐瞻杨, 陈文治, 罗永巨, 等. 尼罗罗非鱼(Tilapia nilotica)不同月龄数量性状遗传力估计[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2015, 46(5):1180-1185. Tang Z Y, Chen W Z, Luo Y J, et al. Estimating quantitative trait heritability for Tilapia nilotica of different months[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2015, 46(5):1180-1185(in Chinese).
    [26] 张成松, 李富花, 相建海. 脊尾白虾形态性状对体质量影响的通径分析[J]. 水产学报, 2013, 37(6):809-815. Zhang C S, Li F H, Xiang J H. Path analysis of effects of morphometric attributes on body weight of Exopalaemon carinicauda[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2013, 37(6):809-815(in Chinese).
    [27] 平洪领, 李玉全. 逐步线性回归法实现天津厚蟹(Helice tiPing H L, Li Y Q. Pth analysis between morphometric traits and body weight on Helice tientsinensis by multiple regression[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2013, 44(5):1353-1357(in Chinese).tsinPing H L, Li Y Q. Pth analysis between morphometric traits and body weight on Helice tientsinensis by multiple regression[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2013, 44(5):1353-1357(in Chinese).sis)表型性状与体重的通径分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2013, 44(5):1353-1357. Ping H L, Li Y Q. Pth analysis between morphometric traits and body weight on Helice tientsinensis by multiple regression[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2013, 44(5):1353-1357(in Chinese).
    [28] 孙成波, 邓先余, 李镇泉, 等. 北部湾野生日本囊对虾(MarsupSun C B, Deng X Y, Li Z Q, et al. Relations of morphemetric attributes and body weight for wild Marsupenaeus japonicus from Beibu gulf[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2008, 39(3):263-268(in Chinese).aeus japonicus)体重和形态性状的关系[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2008, 39(3):263-268. Sun C B, Deng X Y, Li Z Q, et al. Relations of morphemetric attributes and body weight for wild Marsupenaeus japonicus from Beibu gulf[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2008, 39(3):263-268(in Chinese).
    [29] 李建立, 王春德, 李朝霞, 等. 紫扇贝和海湾扇贝杂交家系的生长和通径分析[J]. 海洋科学, 2012, 36(8):15-20. Li J L, Wang C D, Li Z X, et al. Growth and path analyses of hybrid families between the Peruvian and bay scallop[J]. Marine Sciences, 2012, 36(8):15-20(in Chinese).
    [30] 丁君, 许通, 常亚青, 等. 皱纹盘鲍(Haliotis discus hannai Ino)数量性状的相关性与通径分析[J]. 农学学报, 2014, 4(12):82-86. Ding J, Xu T, Chang Y Q, et al. Correlation and path analysis of quantitative traits of Haliotis discus hannai Ino[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2014, 4(12):82-86(in Chinese).
    [31] 冷晓飞, 张艳, 张伟杰, 等. 不同性别马粪海胆壳形态性状对体质量的影响效果分析[J]. 水产科学, 2016, 35(4):359-363. Leng X F, Zhang Y, Zhang W J, et al. Mathematical analysis of effects of morphometric attributes on body weight for sea urchin Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus[J]. Fisheries Science, 2016, 35(4):359-363(in Chinese).
    [32] 周绍峰, 黄伟卿, 周瑞发, 等. 6月龄赤点石斑鱼主要形态性状与体质量的相关分析[J]. 水产学杂志, 2015, 28(3):48-51. Zhou S F, Huang W Q, Zhou R F, et al. Correlation analysis of main morphological traits with body weight of 6 month old redspotted grouper Epinephelus akaara[J]. Chinese Journal of Fisheries, 2015, 28(3):48-51(in Chinese).
    [33] 区又君, 吉磊, 李加儿, 等. 卵形鲳鲹不同月龄选育群体主要形态性状与体质量的相关性分析[J]. 水产学报, 2013, 37(7):961-969. Ou Y J, Ji L, Li J E, et al. Correlation analysis of major morphometric traits and body weight of selective group at different month ages of Trachinotus ovatus[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2013, 37(7):961-969(in Chinese).
    [34] 齐明, 侯俊利, 楼宝, 等. 一龄四指马鲅形态性状对体重的影响分析[J]. 浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版), 2014, 33(2):134-139. Qi M, Hou J L, Lou B, et al. Effects of morphometric attributes on body weight for one-year-old Eleutheronema tetradactylum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Natural Science), 2014, 33(2):134-139(in Chinese).
    [35] 李建生, 胡芬, 严利平. 东海区银鲳资源合理利用的研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8):1420-1429 Li J S, Hu F, Yan L P. Study on the rational utilization of Pampus argenteus resources in the East China Sea region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(8):1420-1429(in Chinese).
    [36] 王雪辉, 杜飞雁, 邱永松. 南海北部主要经济鱼类体长与体重关系[J]. 台湾海峡, 2006, 25(2):262-266. Wang X H, Du F Y, Qiu Y S. Length-weight relationships of important commercial fishes in northern South China Sea[J]. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait, 2006, 25(2):262-266(in Chinese).
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

黄建盛,陈刚,张健东,王忠良,刘碧焕,阮涛.褐点石斑鱼不同月龄形态性状的主成分及通径分析[J].水产学报,2017,41(7):1105~1115

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2226
  • 下载次数: 2314
  • HTML阅读次数: 1563
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-25
  • 最后修改日期:2017-02-23
  • 录用日期:2017-03-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-07-24
文章二维码