高通量测序分析凡纳滨对虾育苗期水体菌群结构特征
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广东海洋大学,广东海洋大学水产学院,广东海洋大学水产学院,广东海洋大学水产学院,广东海洋大学水产学院,广东海洋大学水产学院,广东海洋大学水产学院,广东海洋大学水产学院

中图分类号:

Q938.8; S945

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(31372536,31502189);广东省科技计划项目(2015A020209160)


Characterization of aquatic bacterial community of Litopenaeus vannamei larvae during hatchery period with high-throughput sequencing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University,Fisheries College,Guangdong Ocean University,Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University,Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University,Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University,Fisheries College,Guangdong Ocean University,Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University,Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [32]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解凡纳滨对虾育苗期正常苗池水体菌群结构和多样性变化,实验采用Illumina MiSeq高通量测序水体细菌16S rDNA V4区,比较幼体在无节V期(N5)、溞状Ⅱ期(Z2)、糠虾Ⅰ期(M1)与仔虾Ⅰ期(P1)时的水体菌群特征。结果显示,水体菌群Shannon多样性指数随幼体发育先降后升,而Pielou均匀度指数除在N5时稍高外,在其余阶段都很接近。育苗期间,变形菌门为水体绝对优势菌群(50.0%~88.0%),尤其红杆菌科从N5到P1阶段分别占24.2%、61.6%、43.3%和51.8%;拟杆菌门在各期丰度均>9.7%,其中腐螺旋菌科以5.3%~16.9%优势分布于后3个阶段;放线菌门在后3个期都为优势类群,并以微杆菌科为主,丰度分别达5.6%、37.6%和10.8%;而疣微菌门只在P1时表现为优势(5.3%)。苗池水体核心菌属主要由洛克氏菌、海命菌、栖东海菌、亚硫酸杆菌和2个分类未定属构成。可见水体菌群呈高度多样而动态变化,且N5菌群明显区别于后3个阶段。育苗期间水体主要环境因子总体波动较小,对优势操作分类单元(OTU)丰度分布无显著影响。研究表明,凡纳滨对虾健康苗池水体菌群随幼体发育和饵料投喂而明显更替,其中核心菌群的潜在功能对维持水体生态系统稳定起重要作用,可为对虾育苗益生菌与健康苗池指示菌的筛选提供依据。

    Abstract:

    In order to characterize the bacterial community structure and diversity in rearing water of healthy Litopenaeus vannamei larvae during hatchery period, the genomic DNA of aquatic microbiota from larval stages of nauplius 5 (N5), zoea 2 (Z2), mysis 1 (M1) and postlarvae 1 (P1) was amplified with 16S rDNA V4 primers and sequenced by a high-throughput Illumina MiSeq platform. The results showed that the bacterial Shannon diversity index increased at P1 stage after declining gradually from stages N5 to M1, the Pielou evenness index at N5 stage was a little higher than those of the following three stages, which were approximated closely. During the entire larviculture period, the phylum Proteobacteria was overwhelmingly dominated in rearing water with high abundance up to 50.0%-88.0%, especially, the family Rhodobacteraceae of which had high abundances of 24.2%, 61.6%, 43.3%, and 51.8% at stages N5, Z2, M1, and P1, respectively. Bacteroidetes thrived in various stages with abundance higher than 9.7%, and the family Saprospiraceae of this phylum existed significantly (5.3%-16.9%) in the latter three phases. Actinobacteria presented also dominantly in rearing water except for the N5 stage, and the family Microbacteriaceae with abundances of 5.6%, 37.6% and 10.8% for Z2, M1, and P1 stages, respectively. The phylum Verrucomicrobia dominated only at P1 stage (5.3%). In the larviculture water, the core microbiota at genus level consisted of Loktanella, Marivita, Donghicola, Sulfitobacter, and two unclassified candidates. Thus the microbiota in larval rearing water harbored a high diversity and presented dynamic succession, which differed obviously between N5 stage and the latter three stages. Overall, the main environmental factors in larviculture water varied slightly and exhibited no significant effect on abundance of dominant OTUs (operational taxonomic units). In conclusion, the bacterial community in rearing water of healthy L. vannamei larvae shifts in composition and abundance with larval development and diet feeding. And the core microbiota with potential functions play an important role in maintaining homeostasis in the larviculture system, which could serve as candidates for autochthonous probiotics, as well as healthy indicator for shrimp larviculture.

    参考文献
    [1] 徐怀恕, 杨学宋, 李筠, 等. 对虾育苗期细菌病害的诊断与控制[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1999.
    Xu H S, Yang X S, Li Y, et al. Diagnosis and control of bacterial diseases in Penaeid shrimp hatcheries[M]. Beijing: Ocean Press, 1999 (in Chinese).
    [2] Vandenberghe J, Verdonck L, Robles-Arozarena R, et al. Vibrios associated with Litopenaeus vannamei larvae, postlarvae, broodstock, and hatchery probionts[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65(6): 2592-2597.
    [3] FAO. Health management and biosecurity maintenance in white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) hatcheries in Latin America[R]. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 450. Rome. 2003,
    [4] Bourne D G, Young N, Webster N, et al. Microbial community dynamics in a larval aquaculture system of the tropical rock lobster, Panulirus ornatus[J]. Aquaculture, 2004, 242(1-4): 31-51.
    [5] Soto-Rodríguez S A, Simoes N, Roque A, et al. Pathogenicity and colonization of Litopenaeus vannamei larvae by luminescent vibrios[J]. Aquaculture, 2006, 258(1-4): 109-115.
    [6] Michaud L, Lo Giudice A, Troussellier M, et al. Phylogenetic characterization of the heterotrophic bacterial communities inhabiting a marine recirculating aquaculture system[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2009, 107(6): 1935-1946.
    [7] Blancheton J P, Attramadal K J K, Michaud L, et al. Insight into bacterial population in aquaculture systems and its implication[J]. Aquacultural Engineering, 2013, 53: 30-39.
    [8] 张吕平, 胡超群, 罗鹏, 等. 抗生素对于对虾苗池水体细菌区系的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(10): 2551-2557.
    Zhang L P, Hu C Q, Luo P, et al. Effects of antibiotics on bacterial community in shrimp hatchery system[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(10): 2551-2557 (in Chinese).
    [9] Wen C Q, Xue M, Liang H F, et al. Evaluating the potential of marine Bacteriovorax sp. DA5 as a biocontrol agent against vibriosis in Litopenaeus vannamei larvae[J]. Veterinary Microbiology, 2014, 173(1-2): 84-91.
    [10] Xue M, Liang H F, He Y Y, et al. Characterization and in-vivo evaluation of potential probiotics of the bacterial flora within the water column of a healthy shrimp larviculture system[J]. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2016, 34(3): 484-491.
    [11] Wu L Y, Wen C Q, Qin Y J, et al. Phasing amplicon sequencing on Illumina Miseq for robust environmental microbial community analysis[J]. BMC Microbiology, 2015, 15:125.
    [12] 中华人民共和国国家标准海洋监测规范第 4 部分: 海水分析(GB17378.4-2007)[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
    State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision of China. The specification for marine monitoring Part 4: seawater analysis (GB 17378.4-2007)[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2007 (in Chinese).
    [13] Ahn S J, Costa J, Emanuel J R. PicoGreen quantification of DNA: effective evaluation of samples pre- or post-PCR[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1996, 24(13): 2623-2625.
    [14] 温崇庆, 何瑶瑶, 薛明, 等. 高通量测序分析DNA提取引起的对虾肠道菌群结构偏差[J]. 微生物学报, 2016, 56(1):130-142.
    Wen C Q, He YY, Xue M, et al. Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2016, 56(1): 130-142 (in Chinese).
    [15] Kirchman D L. The ecology of Cytophaga-Flavobacteria in aquatic environments[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2002, 39(2): 91-100.
    [16] Das S, Ward L R, Burke C. Prospects of using marine actinobacteria as probiotics in aquaculture[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2008, 81(3): 419-429.
    [17] Pujalte M J, Lucena T, Ruvira M A, et al. The Family Rhodobacteraceae[M]//Rosenberg E, DeLong E F, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. (Eds.) The Prokaryotes (4th edition), Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteo-bacteria. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 439-512.
    [18] Lenk S, Moraru C, Hahnke S, et al. Roseobacter clade bacteria are abundant in coastal sediments and encode a novel combination of sulfur oxidation genes[J]. ISME Journal, 2012, 6(12): 2178-2187.
    [19] McIlroy S J, Nielsen P H. The Family Saprospiraceae[M]//Rosenberg E, DeLong E F, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. (Eds.) The Prokaryotes (4th edition), Other Major Lineages of Bacteria and the Archaea. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 863-889.
    [20] McBrideM J. The Family Flavobacteriaceae[M]//Rosen-berg E, DeLong E F, Lory S, Eds. The prokaryotes (4th edition), other major lineages of Bacteria and the Archaea. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 643-676.
    [21] Nielsen P H, Mielczarek A T, Kragelund C, et al. A conceptual ecosystem model of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(17): 5070-5088.
    [22] Stackebrandt E, Brambilla E, Richert K. Gene sequence phylogenies of the family Microbacteriaceae[J]. Current Microbiology, 2007, 55(1): 42-46.
    [23] Trotsenko Y A, Doronina N V, Khmelenina V N. Biotechnological potential of aerobic methylotrophic bacteria: a review of current state and future prospects[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 2005, 41(5):433-441.
    [24] Kostka J E, Prakash O, Overholt W A, et al. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and the bacterial community response in Gulf of Mexico beach sands impacted by the deepwater horizon oil spill[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(22): 7962-7974.
    [25] Tavormina P L, Ussler III W, Orphan V J. Planktonic and sediment-associated aerobic methanotrophs in two seep systems along the north American margin[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74(13): 3985-3995.
    [26] Xue M, Wen C Q, Liang H F, et al. In vivo evaluation of the effects of commercial Bacillus probiotics on survival and development of Litopenaeus vannamei larvae during the early hatchery period[J]. Aquaculture Research, 2016. 47(5): 1661-1669.
    [27] Sakami T, Koiso M, Sugaya T. Characterization of bacterial community composition in rotifer cultures under unexpected growth suppression[J]. Fish Science, 2014, 80(4): 757-765.
    [28] Xiong J B, Zhu J L, Zhang D M. The application of bacterial indicator phylotypes to predict shrimp health status[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(19): 8291-8299.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

薛明,何瑶瑶,邱孟德,梁华芳,陈第省,王立群,刘杨锋,温崇庆.高通量测序分析凡纳滨对虾育苗期水体菌群结构特征[J].水产学报,2017,41(5):785~794

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2262
  • 下载次数: 2615
  • HTML阅读次数: 1319
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-24
  • 最后修改日期:2016-08-27
  • 录用日期:2016-11-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-05-23
文章二维码