Effects of arginine supplementation in plant-protein-based low-fishmeal feed on growth, feeding, antioxidant, immune and intestinal structure of Macrobrachium nipponense
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

S 963.73+1

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Arginine (Arg) plays a vital role in regulating of body growth, antioxidant defense, and protein synthesis. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of plant-protein-based low-fishmeal feed supplemented with arginine on feeding, antioxidant capacity, immunity and intestinal morphology in Macrobrachium nipponense. Five isonitrogenous and isoenergetic dietary groups were formulated to contain varying levels of dietary arginine (0%, 0.60%, 1.20%, 1.80% and 2.40%, respectively) under low fish meal content and high plant protein inclusion. The measured arginine concentrations in diets were 0.80% (0.80% Arg), 1.33% (1.33% Arg), 1.85% (1.85% Arg), 2.24% (2.24% Arg) and 2.65% (2.65% Arg), respectively. The feeding trial lasted for 8 weeks. The results showed that the weight gain initially increased with higher dietary arginine levels before declining. The peak values were observed in the group receiving 1.85% Arg, which significantly surpassed those recorded for the groups receiving diets with 0.80%, 1.33%, or 2.65% Arg (P<0.05). Conversely, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) exhibited an inverse trend, reaching its lowest point in the group fed with a diet containing 1.85% Arg, this value was significantly lower than that of the groups receiving diets with either 0.80% or 2.65% Arg (P<0.05). No significant differences were found regarding survival rate (SR) or feeding rate (FR) among all experimental groups (P<0.05). With the increase in arginine levels, the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and the content of glutathione (GSH) in the 1.85% Arg group were higher than those observed in the 0.80% Arg group (P<0.05). Additionally, the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the 1.85% Arg group was also more significant than that found in the 0.80%, 1.33%, and 2.65% Arg groups (P<0.05). The malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the 1.85% Arg group was notably lower than that of all other groups, reaching statistical significance (P<0.05). Furthermore, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity was lowest in the 1.85% Arg group and significantly lower compared to both of the 0.80% and 1.33% Arg groups (P<0.05). The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity recorded for both of the 1.33% and 1.85% Arg groups was also at its lowest level, significantly less than that in the 0.80%, 2.24% and 2.65% groups (P<0.05). The target of rapamycin (tor) and neuropeptide Y (npy) mRNA expression level in hepatopancreas was upregulated in 1.33% Arg group and higher than that in the other four groups (P<0.05). The ribosomal protein 6kinase (s6k) mRNA expression level in the 1.85% Arg group was the highest and significantly higher than that in 2.24% Arg and 2.65% Arg groups (P<0.05). The leptin mRNA expression level decreased first and then increased, and its expression level was the highest in the 0.80% Arg group. The intestinal microvilli in the 1.85% and 2.24% Arg groups appeared intact, closely arranged, numerous, and slender. It was shown that Arg at a level of 1.85% in plant-protein-based low-fishmeal feed can enhance intestinal morphology, growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and the mRNA levels of genes related to tor signalling pathway and appetite regulation in M. nipponense. Based on second-order regression analysis of weight gain vs. dietary Arg level, the ideal dietary Arg level for M. nipponense was 1.83%.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

WANG Junbao, ZHENG Jinxian, ZHOU Dongsheng, LI Shanshan, KONG Youqin, QI Changle, LIU Yan, XU Qiyou, DING Zhili. Effects of arginine supplementation in plant-protein-based low-fishmeal feed on growth, feeding, antioxidant, immune and intestinal structure of Macrobrachium nipponense[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China,2025,49(4):049614

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 30,2023
  • Revised:October 19,2023
  • Adopted:
  • Online: April 03,2025
  • Published: April 01,2025
Article QR Code