Evaluation of nutrient components and nutritive quality of muscle between pond-and cage-reared paddlefish(Polyodon spathula)
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    A comparative study was conducted on muscle nutritional component and nutritive quality between pond-and cage-reared paddlefish Polyodon spathula.Pond-reared fish were fed with commercial diet while those of cagereared ones took natural diet,i.e.,zooplankton.The results showed that pond group contained significantly(P<0.05)higher crude protein and crude ash and lower crude fat than cage group.The constitutional rate of essential amino acids met the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/Word Health Organization(FAO/WHO)standards and the content of Lys was highest in essential amino acids in both pond and cage groups.The content of total delicious amino acids(∑DAA)in pond group was significantly lower than that of cage group(P<0.05).According to nutrition evaluation in amino acids score(AAS)and chemical score(CS),the first limited amino acids were Val and Met+Cys in both pond and cage groups.The content of ∑MUFA in pond group was significantly higher than those of cage group(P<0.05),while contents of ∑SFA and ∑PUFA were lower than that of cage group(P>0.05).The percentages of ∑n-3PUFAs/∑n-6PUFA and EPA+DHA in pond group were significantly lower than those of cage group(P<0.05).It is concluded that paddlefish reared with natural diet could be considered to be higher valued fish for human beings than that fed with commercial feed.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

JI Hong, SUN Hai-tao, SHAN Shi-tao. Evaluation of nutrient components and nutritive quality of muscle between pond-and cage-reared paddlefish(Polyodon spathula)[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China,2011,35(2):261~267

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:August 17,2010
  • Revised:November 19,2010
  • Adopted:December 09,2010
  • Online: February 17,2011
  • Published: